Skip to content
Apex Nursing

Case Study — Neurology

Stroke NGN Case Study

A Next Gen NCLEX-style unfolding case. Read each step, commit to your own answer — out loud or on paper — and only then reveal ours. The six steps mirror the NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model exactly as the exam tests it.

15 min activity · Neurology

The Scenario

0905, ED arrival: Mrs. Chen, 76, is brought in by her daughter. At breakfast — about 0810, mid-conversation — her face “went crooked” and her coffee cup slipped from her right hand. She was completely normal before that; the daughter is certain because they were talking. History: atrial fibrillation (she stopped her anticoagulant months ago — “it caused bruising”), hypertension, osteoarthritis.

0910 Assessment

  • HR 92 irregularly irregular · BP 178/96 · RR 18 · SpO₂ 96% RA · Temp 36.9°C
  • Left facial droop; right arm drifts and falls within 5 seconds; right leg weak
  • Speech slurred but intelligible; follows commands; anxious and tearful
  • Swallow not yet assessed; daughter asks if she can give her mother water

Step 1 — Recognize Cues

Which findings are most relevant — and which matter most right now? List the cues you would flag before revealing.

Reveal answer

Most concerning cues: sudden focal deficits — facial droop, unilateral arm and leg weakness, slurred speech — the BE-FAST core. Sudden onset is the word that matters: strokes announce themselves in seconds to minutes.

The two golden details: a witnessed last known well of 0810 (a reliable clock makes her a potential thrombolytic candidate — it’s 0910 now, about one hour in) and atrial fibrillation off anticoagulation — the textbook setup for a cardioembolic ischemic stroke.

The cue hiding in a question: the daughter offering water. Nothing by mouth until a swallow screen passes — aspiration is one of the most preventable stroke complications.

Step 2 — Analyze Cues

What conditions could explain this picture — and what two tests must sort them before any treatment?

Reveal answer

Ischemic stroke (most supported): afib without anticoagulation makes an embolic clot the leading explanation for sudden unilateral deficits.

Hemorrhagic stroke: clinically indistinguishable at the bedside — which is exactly why the non-contrast head CT is the gatekeeper. Thrombolytics given into a bleed are lethal; nothing clot-busting happens before the scan.

Hypoglycemia — the great mimic: a fingerstick glucose is the other mandatory check; low sugar can produce focal deficits that resolve with dextrose. Hers is 132 — ruled out.

Also on the list: seizure with Todd’s paralysis, migraine variants — kept in mind, but a witnessed sudden onset in an afib patient doesn’t wait on them.

Step 3 — Prioritize Hypotheses

Rank your hypotheses and name the constraint that shapes everything.

Reveal answer

1. Acute ischemic stroke within the treatment window — probable, lethal to brain tissue by the minute (“time is brain”), and uniquely time-gated: IV thrombolysis is generally limited to within 3–4.5 hours of last known well, and large-vessel occlusions may also be thrombectomy candidates. Every workflow decision bends around that clock.

2. Hemorrhagic stroke — less likely but catastrophic to miss; the CT result flips the entire treatment plan, so it happens before anything else.

NGN logic: when one hypothesis carries a closing time window, speed itself becomes a priority — the evaluation is run in parallel (CT, labs, NIHSS together), not in sequence.

Step 4 — Generate Solutions

What should happen in the next 30 minutes? Draft your action list — include what you anticipate the stroke team will need.

Reveal answer

Immediate: activate the stroke alert; stat non-contrast head CT (the single rate-limiting step); fingerstick glucose (done — 132); NIHSS by a certified assessor; two IV lines; labs (CBC, coags, BMP) drawn without delaying the scan; accurate weight (tPA is weight-based); cardiac monitor (her afib is already showing).

Protect her while the clock runs: NPO until a swallow screen, head of bed per protocol, fall precautions, frequent neuro checks — and keep the daughter close: she is the time-of-onset witness and the history source.

Anticipate the eligibility screen: the team will run thrombolytic inclusion/exclusion criteria — recent surgery, bleeding history, anticoagulant use (she stopped hers — in this case that removes an exclusion), BP thresholds (generally must be below ~185/110 before tPA, managed with IV agents if needed).

Step 5 — Take Action

0950: CT shows no hemorrhage. NIHSS 11. The team gives IV thrombolysis at 1005 — just under two hours from onset. What does your nursing care look like for the next 24 hours?

Reveal answer

Intensive monitoring: neuro checks and vitals on the post-tPA schedule (typically q15min ×2h, then q30min ×6h, then hourly), with BP kept below ~180/105 — hypertension into a freshly lysed brain risks hemorrhagic conversion.

Bleeding vigilance: any neuro decline, new severe headache, vomiting, or acute hypertension = suspect intracranial hemorrhage → stop any infusing thrombolytic, stat CT, call the team. Also watch gums, IV sites, urine, and for angioedema (tongue/lip swelling — airway risk, higher in patients on ACE inhibitors).

Hold the blood thinners: no anticoagulants or antiplatelets for the first 24 hours post-tPA; no unnecessary lines, injections, or invasive procedures. Swallow screen before anything by mouth. Her afib anticoagulation conversation comes later — and matters enormously for preventing the next stroke.

Step 6 — Evaluate Outcomes

Next morning: NIHSS is down to 4 — the arm lifts and holds, speech is nearly clear, a mild facial droop remains. BP 152/84 on schedule, no bleeding. The daughter asks, “So she’s cured?” Which findings show success, and what still needs doing?

Reveal answer

Improving: the falling NIHSS is the objective marker — reperfusion salvaged threatened brain. No hemorrhagic conversion through the highest-risk window, BP controlled.

Still watching: the 24-hour follow-up CT before starting antithrombotics, swallow function before diet advancement, mood (post-stroke depression is common and undertreated), and mobility/fall risk as she re-engages.

Not resolved — and the honest answer to the daughter: the deficit is improving, not erased, and the cause is untreated. Secondary prevention is the discharge mission: restarting anticoagulation for afib (addressing the bruising concern that made her quit), BP control, rehab referrals, and BE-FAST teaching for the whole family — they caught this one fast; they should know exactly what they did right.

Debrief — The Pattern to Keep

  • Last known well is the most valuable history item in stroke — pin it down and protect the witness who knows it.
  • Glucose and CT before anything clot-related: one rules out the mimic, the other rules out the bleed.
  • Afib off anticoagulation is the classic embolic-stroke setup — and the secondary-prevention target afterward.
  • Post-tPA: BP below ~180/105, no antithrombotics ×24h, and any neuro change = stat CT.
  • NPO until the swallow screen passes — aspiration pneumonia is the preventable second injury.

Related Resources